• Determination of a Trademark as Being “Deceptive and Misleading” - A Successful Trademark Refusal Review represented by Unitalen
    Shandong New Hope Liuhe Group Co., Ltd (hereinafter referred to as “New Hope”) filed an application for registration of trademark  in Class 29 in respect of meat products, etc., which was rejected by Trademark Office in accordance with Article 10 Paragraph...October 31, 2017
  • Unitalen Client Nuctech Won Second - Instance Trade Secret Dispute vs. Powerscan
    As a large security products and service provider, Nuctech Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as Nuctech) provides products and services to more than 150 countries and regions. Since 2003, Nuctech has been cooperating with several companies in Malaysia, among which, Pan Asiatic Technologies Sdn Bhd (hereinafter referred to as PAT) became their exclusiv...October 31, 2017
  • Affirmation on Distinctiveness of Trademark - a Winning Case Represented by Unitalen
    Qu Mei Furniture Group Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “QM Group”) applied for registration of QM trademark in respect of furniture and the accessories on Feb 18, 2014. The application was rejected by the Trademark Office on the ground that the mark consists of only two English letters in plain form which is devoid of d...October 21, 2017
  • A Trademark Opposition Case of Unitalen Involving Well-Known TV Program Name "Run Bros!'
    奔跑吧兄弟 ( “Run bros!” in English) is the original name of a TV program introduced and produced by the opponent, and the program’s episodes are broadcasted in Zhejiang TV in a rolling manner. The opposed party applied for trademark registration of 奔跑吧兄弟 for goods in Class 18. The opponent believed that the opposed mark has infringed ...October 21, 2017
  • A Typical Case – Determination of Similarity between Goods and Services
    Recently Unitalen has helped DHC winning a trademark case, which is worth of sharing for its typical significance in determining trademark similartiy between goods and services...July 13, 2017
  • Unitalen Won Retrial Case for Shanghai Oriental Glasses, a China Time-honored Business Name
    Shanghai Oriental Glasses Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Shanghai Oriental”) was first established in 1928. In 2004, Guangzhou Oriental Glasses Chain Store, Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Guangzhou Oriental”) applied for registration of 东方 (“oriental” in Chinese) mark in respect of optical shop service in Clas...July 13, 2017
  • Invalidation Proceeding Represented by Unitalen Selected in 2016 Top 10 Patent Reexamination Cases
    April 26, 2017, State Intellectual Property Office Patent Reexamination Board published the Top 10 Patent Reexamination & Invalidation Cases in 2016, which were selected for the social attention received, the guiding significance in application of examination standard, and the clarity of the decision reasoning. The invalidation case of No. ZL 20132015657...July 13, 2017
  • Two Unitalen Cases Selected as 2016 Top 10 Typical Cases by Beijing Higher Court
    April 20, 2017, Beijing People’s Higher Court published Top 10 typical judicial protection cases of 2016. Administrative litigation concerning “Wechat” trademark opposition Review and Wen Rui-an Kungfu Novels’ Adaptation Right and Unfair Competition Dispute, both represented by Unitalen, were among the list......July 13, 2017
  • Unitalen Client AUPU Won an 8-Year Fight against AOPU
    AUPU bath master is an innovative product developed by Hangzhou Aupu Electric Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Hangzhou Aupu”), with multiple functions including lighting, ventilation and heating. Their trademark 奥普 (AUPU in Chinese) was registered in June 1998 and recognized as a well-known trademark for hot air Bath Devices and bath hea...June 30, 2017
  • Unitalen Succeeded in Invalidating a Dry Fryer Patent
    SEB, a French company, was granted Chinese invention patent No. 200580018875.3 for a dry fryer (patent at issue) on Sep 9, 2009. Entrusted by Jarden Corporation, a British company, Unitalen put up a team of seven lawyers and patent attorneys working on invalidation of the patent at issue since 2010. October 20, 2015, the Patent Reexamination Board made a dec...June 30, 2017
  • "LAFITE" Trademark Dispute Represented by Unitalen Elected 2016 Top 10 IP Litigation in China
    On April 24, 2017, China Supreme People's Court published the "2016 Top 10 IP Litigation Cases", electing the retrial case of Château Lafite Rothschild, represented by Unitalen, vs. Trademark Review and Adjudication Board and Nanjing Golden Hope Wine Co., Ltd. on trademark dispute......May 3, 2017
  • Unitalen Won the 2nd Instance Trial for Client Lifan on “Sharkfin Antenna” Patent
    Taizhou Suzhong Antenna Group Co., Ltd (“Suzhong”). is a professional antenna manufacturer, who claims itself to be the largest antenna manufacturer in China. Jiang Xiaoping, the legal representative of Suzhong, is the patentee of ZL 200710019425.7 "shark fin antenna" patent (“Plaintiff”). Based on their antenna series paten...May 2, 2017
  • First Previous Page 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next Page Last